The Complex Interplay Between Globalization And Terrorism: Analysis Of Relationship And Implications For Security Studies

Introduction

Globalization has now covered the entire globe, extending and occurring on the most significant national and international agendas. The process of globalization contains tremendous improvements amongst nations throughout the world, such as technical, economic, cultural, and scientific advancements, but it is also viewed as a danger by many countries.

On the one hand, globalization across countries gives enormous alleviation and rewards in a variety of fields. Globalization, on the other hand, introduces hazards with long-term and severe implications. With the advancement of globalization, the world’s issues have multiplied, making them more difficult to face. The emergence of terrorism is one of the major concerns that has resulted from globalization. [1]Terrorism is a phenomenon that has spread to practically every corner of the world in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. As a result of local and foreign terrorist activity, several nations in the Middle East and North Africa have been at the epicenter of this carnage. While it is obvious that there is no one cause of terrorism, it has been stated that increased globalization has led to outbreaks of terrorist violence. If globalization has had such a role, higher levels of terrorism would be connected with higher levels of globalization.

Globalization and Terrorism

Globalization appears to be associated with political challenges in several nations. According to Paul Wilkinson, current terrorism is a reaction to globalization[2]. Globalization is a highly complicated process that has been characterized in a dizzying array of ways. In the economic realm, however, there is at least some widespread agreement on basic contours; globalization entails “the broadening, deepening, and speeding up of international connectivity.” [3]Globalization, on the other hand, involves cultural, military, political, and social components in addition to increased economic ties. in the movement of products, services, people, ideas, and civilizations across geographical boundaries A variety of variables are expected to contribute to higher levels of globalization.

Recent advances in total globalization, for example, have been linked to a beneficial convergence of technical, political, and economic variables. One of the effects of the movement of ideas and resources is that socially diverse groups are frequently forced into greater physical proximity to each other, potentially increasing conflict. Globalization, on the other hand, includes cultural, military, political, and social components as well as growing economic linkages. [4]Inequality in societies may also rise when local organizations and people adjust to new external players, new competition from elsewhere in the globaleconomy, andotherchangesintheircircumstancesorplaceintheworld. In the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the growth of market capitalism linked with globalization frequently weakened the structure of local economies[5].

Traditional economic systems, although having significant levels of internal inequality, generally feature some mechanisms of reciprocity that involve duties on the side of both the well-off and the less well-off. Modern economic methods, on the other hand, might erode the reciprocity aspects while doing nothing to reduce levels of inequality, thus raising societal tensions. [6]Under these conditions, even if globalization typically results in societal or national economic development and more wealth, only some groups profit while others suffer. According to one recent study, more trade, the conventional type of economic globalization, is related to lower inequality; conversely, financial globalization, particularly direct foreign investment, is associated with higher inequality[7]. Financial globalization and direct foreign investment, on the other hand, are more recent forms of globalization. From 1990 to 2004, the influence of financial globalization more than doubled.

The effects of globalization are not always negative. Some forms of interaction with the world system have been linked with lower levels of transnational terrorism. Analyses of outbreaks of civil wars, on the other hand, have shown mixed results in terms of their relation to globalization but provide at least some indication of a connection. If such is the case, globalization can be both a blessing and a curse.[8] Countries that have become more integrated into the global system may eventually be able to increase their stability, but countries undergoing the process of integration or facing the shocks that come with globalization may be likely to suffer greater disruptions or problems.

There has been huge proof that globalization has prompted political savagery in various periods and areas.[9] In many prior times, expanding globalization was connected with rough episodes. In the old world, the fuse of Judea – first into Greek realms and afterward into the Roman Empire-prompted changes in the monetary design of the nearby society and minimization of certain gatherings in the area. The fuse of Judea and Israel into prior realms had not tested the essential monetary and social frameworks of the Jewish people group, dissimilar to the difficulties introduced by the Greek and Roman states. [10]One result of this disturbance was a progression of Judean rebels against the Greeks and the Romans. These rebellions at first depended on illegal intimidation and hit-and-run combat, and afterward at last on regular fights. The Boxer Rebellion in China in the late nineteenth century was in numerous ways an ethnic and social response to globalization and the subsequent interruption of unfamiliar thoughts into customary Chinese society.[11]

In later times, left-wing radicals that were dynamic in the last option of the 20th century were eagerly against the worldwide spread of free enterprise. The world frameworks hypothesis proposes that modernized states are liable for underdevelopment and the disappointments of states on the fringe of the worldwide framework. The rising reach of worldwide companies that accompanied globalization was viewed as a complete fiendish that must be gone against by savagery. Rough gatherings with traditional philosophies have likewise been responding to what they see to be the adverse consequences of globalization. The ongoing discussions about movement in Europe and the United States are one more sign of such famous worries. Egalitarian gatherings have regularly gone against the movement of individuals from socially and strictly unique regions. [12]

The Red Scare in the United States after World War I was a comparable response to the spread of what numerous in the United States saw as extremist and risky liberal philosophies like communism, socialism, and turmoil that undermined the American method of life. Opposition to unfamiliar impacts isn’t limited to larger populaces. More modest ethnic networks have likewise seen their societies at risk of being overpowered or consumed by bigger gatherings as a result of the homogenizing patterns that are frequently connected with globalization and hence frequently resort to savagery “justifiably”. It has been proposed that fearmonger activities coordinated explicitly against the United States have been a response to the social globalization that accompanies more prominent contact with the West.[13]

Religious terrorism increased greatly towards the end of the twentieth century. In a few events, different strict gatherings have responded adversely to the difficulties that accompany globalization. Globalization by its very nature can subvertconventionalstrictqualitiesinsocialorders.Westernsecularismhas undermined native societies and neighborhood religions presented to the more extensive world. The spread of thoughts connected to globalization can advance uprisings established in religion, a response to the danger of worldwide homogenization. One outcome of expanding globalization and the spread of secularization has been a resurgence in strict convictions, including fundamentalist perspectives, on the planet’s all significant religions. There are Jewish radical gatherings in Israel that have responded to globalization by focusing on Palestinian Arabs as well as by going after Jewish residents that they consider excessively common.[14] Islamic gatherings have answered the dangers that globalization addresses to them.

The worldwide jihad has addressed a proceeding with reaction to the danger that openness to the more extensive world has addressed to the Islamic people group. The prior viciousness including Palestinians, particularly the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO), was, even more, a patriot reaction to the presence of Israel as opposed to a strict one yet reflected some degree to a limited extent globalization impacts. Boko Haram (“Western Education is Forbidden”) in Nigeria is only one of the most recent appearances of this pattern.

The financial disengagements that accompanied globalization have underestimated numerous people in northern Nigeria, including gatherings of Muslims who have lost both their monetary and economic well being. A considerable lot of them have been drawn to Boko Haram[15]. Somewhere else, assailant Hindus in India have endeavored to drive out unfamiliar strict impacts.

Muslims have been the significant targets, yet Christianity is likewise viewed as a danger to radical Hindus. A few conservative gatherings in the United States that are against unfamiliar impacts and workers have a reasonably strict component in their philosophies. The Aum Shinrikyo clique in Japan that sent off the sarin gas assaults in the Tokyo metros mirrored an elevated degree of worry about the social and strict changes that accompanied globalization. The impacts have been general, “as the globalization of culture will in general advance fundamentalism or strictness in practically all religions.”

Globalization affects the pervasiveness of illegal intimidation and the strategies utilized. The presence of current correspondences and transportation has given open doors to savage associations to gain from one another, to speak with individuals in far-off areas, and to contact potential enlisted people. It likewise gives more noteworthy open doors to fierce gatherings to endeavor to impact outer entertainers with their attacks. Although rebels rehearsed an early type of leaderless opposition assaults with their missions of deaths, this kind of illegal intimidation has become more common with the web and online entertainment. The Islamic State in Syria and Iraq (ISIL) has exhibited quite well the possibility that cutting edge types of correspondences have for enlisting likely unfamiliar warriors to its positions and affect others to attempt solitary individual assaults on their home ground.[2] Present-day transportation linkages have worked with movement, permitting the starting of psychological militant assaults in unfamiliar nations.

Globalization can cause strict, ethnic, financial, and philosophical resistance developments with splinter gatherings of them participating in vicious reactions, including the utilization of psychological oppressor strategies. Globalization might cause such viciousness, add to it, or be to a great extent superfluous at times. Since there is no single reason for terrorism, globalization won’t make sense of all flare-ups of viciousness, however, there could well be some association.

Conclusion

The intricacy of the connection between globalization and terrorism gives restricted data that can be useful to state-run administrations looking to forestall viciousness. The intricacies recommend that extraordinary consideration must be utilized to figure out which sorts of worldwide communications are possibly hazardous since these can fluctuate over the long haul. Regardless of whether the linkages were clearer, there is minimal that state-run administrations can do about globalization regardless of whether they want to do as such. The interaction gives off an impression of being unavoidable. To date, the counter-globalization developments, both vicious and peaceful, that have seemed to challenge the impacts of globalization have been excessively powerless to successfully challenge the political elites who favor globalization. While the resistance is probably going to proceed, it is probably not going to have the option to forestall globalization, even though it could adjust a portion of the unfortunate results that can accompany that cycle.

References

1. Mekaj G, Mekaj G. Globalization and Rise of Terrorism. Path Sci. 2020;6(9):5001-5009. doi:10.22178/pos.62-11
2. and Terrorism in the Middle East on JSTOR. Accessed June 21, 2022. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26297432
3. What Is Globalization? Globalization Explained. Accessed June 21, 2022. https://www.techtarget.com/searchcio/definition/globalization
4. Goryakin Y, Lobstein T, James WPT, Suhrcke M. The impact of economic, political and social globalization on overweight and obesity in the 56 low and middle income countries. Soc Sci Med 1982. 2015;133:67-76. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.030
5. Issues Brief – Globalization: A Brief Overview. Accessed June 21, 2022. https://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/ib/2008/053008.htm
6. Peterson EWF. Is Economic Inequality Really a Problem? A Review of the Arguments. Soc Sci. 2017;6(4):147. doi:10.3390/socsci6040147
7. Rising Income Inequality: Technology, or Trade and Financial Globalization? | SpringerLink. Accessed June 21, 2022. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/imfer.2013.7
8. Globalization: Threat or Opportunity? An IMF Issues Brief. Accessed June 21, 2022. https://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/ib/2000/041200to.htm
9. Has Altered the Role of the State? Accessed June 21, 2022. https://www.e ir.info/2012/11/24/has–altered-the-role-of-states/
10. History of ancient Israel and Judah – Wikipedia. Accessed June 21, 2022. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_ancient_Israel_and_Judah
11. Rebels: The Boxer Rebellion | Facing History and Ourselves. Accessed June 21, 2022. https://www.facinghistory.org/nanjing-atrocities/nation building/rebels-boxer-rebellion
12. Egalitarianism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Accessed June 21, 2022. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/egalitarianism/
13. Levitt T. The Globalization of Markets. Harv Bus Rev. Published online May 1, 1983. Accessed June 21, 2022. https://hbr.org/1983/05/the globalization-of-markets
14. Protracted National Conflict and Fertility Change: Palestinians and Israelis in the Twentieth Century on JSTOR. Accessed June 21, 2022. https://www.jstor.org/stable/172315
15. (PDF) Article The Influence of Globalization on Insurgency: Boko Haram and Al-Shabaab in the Age of Information Technology. Accessed June 21, 2022. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358165067_Article_The_Influenc e_of_Globalization_on_Insurgency_Boko_Haram_and_Al Shabaab_in_the_Age_of_Information_Technology